![]() Or, although the AMRAAM can be fired as a tug-of-war, the latter can, thanks to a data link with the launching aircraft, change its trajectory before switching on its radar and become completely autonomous. In addition to that, the AGM-88 does not require big modifications because the missile works independently of the aircraft. The use of HARM missiles had not required major modifications for Ukrainian MiG-29s and Su-27s: carrying the missile on its standard LAU-118/A pylon, which itself is attached to a modified pylon that allows an LAU-118/A to be attached to the wing of an aircraft of Soviet origin. AMRAAM missiles are already in Ukraine but only for use from NASAMS anti-aircraft systems. There are, for example, modifications on MiG-29 and Su-27 fighter aircraft to carry AGM-88 HARM anti-radar missiles ( article on the subject) as well as on Buk mobile anti-aircraft systems, also of Soviet origin, to fire Rim-7 Sea Sparrow missiles ( more info in this article).Īnother modification seems to be under consideration by the US military and officials: according to the Politico, discussions are underway in Washington, D.C., on a possible delivery of AIM-120 AMRAAM medium-range air-to-air missiles to the Ukrainian Air Force. They also include modifications on vehicles of Soviet origin in order to fire Western ammunition. the deliveries of equipment and their ammunition to Ukraine are very diverse. There is much already known about the missiles it is based upon.ĮVERYONE lies about their capabilities, either positive or negative, to lull the enemy into a false sense of security (or fear).Infantry weapons, armored vehicles of all kinds, artillery howitzers, tanks. As already stated, this stuff is classified so data is scarce.īefore anyone goes screaming "Chinese propaganda!", it is a Russian missile built in cooperation with the Chinese for EXPORT. I linked evidence of all of the above after hours and hours of reading information. The SD-10A is so good it is even used as an AD missile, which reportedly has 80%+ PK. It's closer to the C, but with higher terminal-phase speed and maneuverability, and slightly longer range if fired at optimum launch parameters. The SD-10A is one heck of a missile, and yes, it is superior if flown correctly to the -120B model AMRAAM. I spammed the forum with links to numerous articles and "other information" about the SD-10*A* missile that we should be carrying on the Jeff. There is a ton of discussion on this by AeriaGloria, Harlequin, and others. Search the forum for historic posts by Chiron and myself. Im pretty sure deka has it where they want it as of before the temporary canges. This wasnt ED trying to nerf it, thats all im saying. The point was that ED ran a simple CFD to show how grossly off the original SD-10 was it had more range than an AIM-54 Mk47, and was on par with the Mk60. PS : all missiles in DCS simulated by guessing not from a real data its 100% impossible that any air force or any missile developer company will provide u with the correct data not in a million year u can ask any real pilot and they will never answer its a war changer if this data got leaked in a public gameIm not claiming that EDs suggested correction was 100% accurate. ![]() PS : all missiles in DCS simulated by guessing not from a real data its 100% impossible that any air force or any missile developer company will provide u with the correct data not in a million year u can ask any real pilot and they will never answer its a war changer if this data got leaked in a public game Edited Octoby Chiron BTW i am the one who is talking to Chizh in a forum called SD-10 nerfed go check it They said it supposed to perform like this due to their CFD program that is already running and testing missiles with 1 motor stage and they dont have any evidance i asked chizh that ED have a public data or info about SD-10 he said no they dont know about the missile they simple run a test with an ((((((( old ))))))) CFD program that DEKA said they must change it if Meteor will come to the game due to the missile will fly with a double engine stages And ED did NOT nerf the SD-10 ED provided evidence that the original SD-10 was overperforming, and Deka agreed and gave it reasonable drag values. the SD-10 has the same drag as the 120C rn AND is on the new API, albeit temporarily to fix the RWR bug. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |